Verification — does every point of the area get enough overlap?
Flight geometry
Recommended margin
Your margin → edge overlap
Margin vs. effective overlap at the boundary
Coverage map — how much overlap does each spot of the survey area get?
Survey area by overlap class
Field summary
How the calculation works
Footprint and spacing (camera):
A point in the interior is seen by about L/B photos along track — but photos are whole numbers, so some points get ⌊L/B⌋ and others one more. A flight at overlap o therefore guarantees m = ⌊1/(1 − o)⌋ photos per axis at every point (80 % → 5, 75 % → 4, 70 % → 3, 60 % → 2). The calculator works with these guaranteed counts.
A point on the boundary only gets photos from one side unless the route continues past it. Every station within L/2 of the point sees it, so with margin M the stations that can see it lie in an interval of length min(M, L/2) + L/2. Whatever position the app picks for the first photo/line, that interval holds at least
With M = 0 the boundary gets only about half the interior count. With M = L/2 (half a footprint) it is as good as the interior. Solving n_edge ≥ m for the edge target o:
The verification panel checks this independently: it places every photo and line of the plan for six different alignments of the first line and counts, at 1,000 sample points along each axis of the area (always including the boundary), how many photos and lines cover each one.
For objects of height h, footprints on their tops scale by k = (H − h)/H, so W and L above are replaced by k·W and k·L. This is why tall buildings and tree canopy at the edge need extra margin, and why overlap on rooftops is lower than the value set in the app. A half-footprint margin also puts camera stations outside the boundary so façades facing outward are actually imaged.
The coverage map draws the worst of these alignments. Real apps may place lines and triggers slightly differently, add turn segments, or clip the margin, so treat the map as a model and always check the planned route in the app.
Rule-of-thumb image counts: ≥ 5 images per point for reliable matching; 3D/forest projects usually need ≥ 9–15 (e.g. 80/70 or 85/75). Preset camera values are taken from published specifications — check them against your own EXIF data if you need high precision, or use “Custom”.